[Edited] Hello again, As you asked i send to you my code, in the attached file. I removed a lot of unnecessary things & irrelevant files. Hope that now, it will be easy to follow with minimum stuffs. Also i uploaded a YouTube video, i created in order to show and explain my code parts, and its resul...

Thanks, ill ask my boss in sunday, and update.
Good weekend,
Yoni

Hey, yes - please have a look on the NVS task esp_err_t NVS_task_start(void) { ----if (pdPASS != xTaskCreatePinnedToCore( ------------------------------------------------------------nvs_task_L,///////////////////////////Task function ------------------------------------------------------------"nvs_t...

Hey again ESP_sprite very very thanks for your replying to me! so from main.c i call this function, to start task of toggling the gpio: void gpio_toggle_task_start(void) { ----TaskHandle_t task_handle_io; ----xTaskCreatePinnedToCore( --------------------------------------------gpio_toggle,//////////...

Unfortunately we cannot use external flash to solve easily the problem cause lack of space, so i tried the other suggest, but still not works, am i miss something? I prepared new code that uses 1 task per each core. core 0, (in flash), cache ENABLE for this core - erase sector every 1ms + set gpio 1...

ESP_Sprite, very thanks! ill give it a try

ESP_Sprite - thanks for your answer!
thanks for this advice, i understand why it can be risky to use it.
maybe something else that is not using freertos? even some of the main esp32 api's?
as you know, is there anything that can support it?
thanks again for your interest in my questions!
Yoni

ESP_Sprite, thanks a lot for your interest and your fast reply. The problem i try to solve is: While using esp_partition_erase_range function to erase a sector (using core 0), still perform operations in parallel using core 1. as mentioned in this topic: https://esp32.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=28892&...

ESP_Sprite, very thanks for your answer! My question was that if i'm already INSIDE a function, skip from performing it if the defined timeout ticks elapsed. ill give you another example: imagine you call a function that should sample a sensor every 1ms, but the sensor is not giving you answer even ...

Zeni241 - thanks a lot for your answer, i have searched on it but i didnt find any function to help i found very "close" function that is doing the not of the function i need: xTimerPendFunctionCall() but this function will be performed after the time i define - so its not this. i wonder if you can ...