Search found 3 matches
- Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:27 pm
- Forum: ESP-AT
- Topic: Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
- Replies: 5
- Views: 22157
Re: Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
Hello, I don't quite understand what you mean. Could you describe the problem in detail? For AT communicate over SPI, you can refer to https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-at/en/latest/Compile_and_Develop/How_to_implement_SPI_AT.html. Hi, Maybe it would be best if I explained how it works now wi...
- Fri Oct 22, 2021 5:19 pm
- Forum: ESP-AT
- Topic: Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
- Replies: 5
- Views: 22157
Re: Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
If I'm understanding this right, the SPI interface just provides a transport for the same AT command set and responses. In my particular case it would be worse than the UART interface - just as difficult to parse, probably harder to set up DMA for, and since I've only got one SPI interface available...
- Wed Oct 20, 2021 3:06 am
- Forum: ESP-AT
- Topic: Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
- Replies: 5
- Views: 22157
Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
tl;dr: Is there a binary equivalent of the AT command set? By which I mean one that doesn't use plain ASCII text but rather a consistent binary format? I've been using the SiLabs WGM110 for years. It was derived from the BlueGiga WF121 and uses the same binary BGAPI interface. I'd looked at the ESP8...