Just letting you all know I omitted printfs and stored all the states in a bit array . I reduced delay from 780microsecs to 200nanoseconds thats a super success

Thanks a lot I will definitely try that method

I need to log the behavior of a GPIO ... I am not doing any type of speed test , I need this for system Identification , Basically I want to do GPIO get Input of that particular pin and store a timestamp ....for this what I did was printf("%d\t%lld\n",gpio_get_level(INPUT_SIG_IO),esp_timer_get_time(...

OK That's perfect
I really need time value on terminal so can i reduce the gap of 780 microsec ?

I need to log a GPIO behavior with time, Can You suggest any better way where the gap can be minimized

So in my program I have for(;;) printf("%lld\n",esp_timer_get_time()); only this much code I am pretty much amazed by the results 2817315 2818096 2818878 these are almost 780 microsec apart...How is this possible considering esp32 runs at 240Mhz Forgive me If I asked a NOOB level question...I get it...

You were 100% correct i moved the ledcSetup block inside the task and it solved the issue , but I had declared ledcSetup in setup() [PS. I am writing code in Arduino IDE] how this didn't execute then , is the priority of setup() low ? How did you analyze the error ? Is there any kind of resources or...

This is my backtrace decoded ... What is happening and How to analyze if something like this happens in future Decoding stack results 0x4008c434: invoke_abort at /home/runner/work/esp32-arduino-lib-builder/esp32-arduino-lib-builder/esp-idf/components/esp32/panic.c line 155 0x4008c665: abort at /home...

Yeah I found that . All the possibilities were mentioned in a enum structure

Thanks Buddy..But I need the solution for Esp-IDF

SD for connecting SD cards and CLK is clock signal